Lena/Aug 2016: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ElenaZhivun (talk | contribs) |
ElenaZhivun (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* The device section describes a solution without a problem. Add to the introducion: |
* The device section describes a solution without a problem. Add to the introducion: |
||
** need for the accurate timing |
|||
** need to correlate signals from the different sensors |
|||
** magnetometer has to be portable |
|||
Talked to Thad about a possibility to have a synchronously pumped scalar Mx magnetometer in the fMCG project. The advantages would be: |
Talked to Thad about a possibility to have a synchronously pumped scalar Mx magnetometer in the fMCG project. The advantages would be: |
||
Revision as of 17:12, 22 August 2016
August 2016
08/15/2016
Talked to Dima about the NURI magnetometer network paper. His comments:
- The device section describes a solution without a problem. Add to the introducion:
- need for the accurate timing
- need to correlate signals from the different sensors
- magnetometer has to be portable
Talked to Thad about a possibility to have a synchronously pumped scalar Mx magnetometer in the fMCG project. The advantages would be:
- not having to cancel the field
- no calibration
- no 1/f electronic noise
Disadvantages:
- spin-exchange relaxation
- no vector sensitivity