Lena/Aug 2016: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ElenaZhivun (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= August 2016 = == 08/15/2016 == Talked to Dima about the NURI magnetometer network paper. His comments: * The device section describes a solution without a problem. Add to...") |
ElenaZhivun (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Talked to Thad about a possibility to have a synchronously pumped scalar Mx magnetometer in the fMCG project. The advantages would be: |
Talked to Thad about a possibility to have a synchronously pumped scalar Mx magnetometer in the fMCG project. The advantages would be: |
||
* not having to cancel the field |
|||
* no calibration |
|||
* no 1/f electronic noise |
|||
Disadvantages: |
Disadvantages: |
||
* spin-exchange relaxation |
|||
* no vector sensitivity |
|||
Revision as of 17:12, 22 August 2016
August 2016
08/15/2016
Talked to Dima about the NURI magnetometer network paper. His comments:
- The device section describes a solution without a problem. Add to the introducion:
* need for the accurate timing * need to correlate signals from the different sensors * magnetometer has to be portable
Talked to Thad about a possibility to have a synchronously pumped scalar Mx magnetometer in the fMCG project. The advantages would be:
- not having to cancel the field
- no calibration
- no 1/f electronic noise
Disadvantages:
- spin-exchange relaxation
- no vector sensitivity