Lena/Aug 2016: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ElenaZhivun (talk | contribs) |
ElenaZhivun (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Calculations for an Mx magnetometer built with a paraffin-coated 1cm3 cell show that it should be possible to get around 3 fT/sqrtHz per 1cm of the probe length. |
Calculations for an Mx magnetometer built with a paraffin-coated 1cm3 cell show that it should be possible to get around 3 fT/sqrtHz per 1cm of the probe length. |
||
* Download the Mathematica notebook |
* Download the Mathematica notebook - [[File:ScalarMagnetometerParaffinCells.zip]] |
||
Revision as of 18:47, 22 August 2016
August 2016
08/15/2016
Talked to Dima about the NURI magnetometer network paper. His comments:
- The device section describes a solution without a problem. Add to the introducion:
- need for the accurate timing
- need to correlate signals from the different sensors
- magnetometer has to be portable
Talked to Thad about a possibility to have a synchronously pumped scalar Mx magnetometer in the fMCG project. The advantages would be:
- not having to cancel the field
- no calibration
- no 1/f electronic noise
Disadvantages:
- spin-exchange relaxation
- no vector sensitivity
Calculations for an Mx magnetometer built with a paraffin-coated 1cm3 cell show that it should be possible to get around 3 fT/sqrtHz per 1cm of the probe length.
- Download the Mathematica notebook - File:ScalarMagnetometerParaffinCells.zip