Nick Brewer: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
'''<big>7/22/14</big>'''
We tried to see some absorption again todayyesterday. The data is [https://wiki.physics.wisc.edu/yavuz/images/4/47/Absorption_Data_2014-7-21.pdf here], and looks unconvincing. There is not a strong peak at 1055.076 nm like we are expecting. I think in order to get a better spectrum we will need to measure fluorescence from the crystal like in [http://www.opticsinfobase.org/DirectPDFAccess/B2A160D3-AED0-E02F-14B040E3D6801A62_7350/josab-11-4-591.pdf?da=1&id=7350&seq=0&mobile=no Shen's paper] instead of trying to directly measure absorption. [[Zjs log|Zach]] has been working on the locking circuit and we are now able to get a much less noisy signal. The fast feedback is fed directly to the diode instead of going through the current driver. Before the signal fluctuated ~25% or more when locked but now it is much less and we are able to get a clean signal out. There are still certain wavelengths where the error signal looks more like a peak than a dispersion graph and we are unable to lock, but we haven't yet determined the cause..
 
 
 
'''<big>7/18/14</big>'''[[File:Absorption_Setup.jpg|thumb|300px|Setup used to measure absorption]]
We tried to see some absorption yesterday. We saw fluorescence at the wavelengths we expected to, but the numbers from the photodiodes aren't too convincing. Our setup is shown to the right. For each wavelength of light we took the ratio of the photodiode signals. Scanning over the wavelength was not done too systematically. We tried to get as many wavelengths as we could close to where the peaks should have been. We adjusted the wavelength by adjusting the grating angle, current, temperature, and piezo. We saw fluorescence at wavelengths near the peak, but the quantitative data does not look as good. Our results are shown [https://wiki.physics.wisc.edu/yavuz/images/4/42/Absorption_Data.pdf here].
 

Navigation menu